Cases 11 - 20 of 130
BRILEY v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00193
Petitioner:
JAY BONANZA BRILEY
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ZAVALA v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00191
Petitioner:
ELIAS ZAVALA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER and MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FITZGERALD v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00186
Petitioner:
SHIRLAND L. FITZGERALD
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and MARK A. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAING v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 4:2013cv02742
Petitioner:
SAMRETH CHAING
Respondent:
Janet Napolitano , Eric H. Holder, Jr. and JOHN T.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHAING v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2013cv01602
Petitioner:
SAMRETH CHAING
Respondent:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JOHN T.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
D'AMARIO v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00181
Petitioner:
ARTHUR D'AMARIO, III
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MONROY v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv00144
Petitioner:
JAVIER ALVAREZ MONROY
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv07951
Petitioner:
CLIVE AMROY ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ROY L. HENDRICKS and JOHN TSOUKARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frank Dippolito v. USA, et al
as 12-4446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
MOHAMMED v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv07282
Petitioner:
DONZO MOHAMMED
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ROY L. HENDRICKS and JOHN TSOUKARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
