Cases 11 - 20 of 29
HAMILTON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00027
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Petitioner:
RONALD GLENN HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 1:2019cv00099
Petitioner:
Harry E. Hamilton
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAMILTON v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2018cv00301
Petitioner:
JAMEL HAMILON and JAMEL HAMILTON
Respondent:
MARK WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TUTORA v. 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2017cv05185
Petitioner:
TOLEKSIS TUTORA
Respondent:
1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LEIDENHEIM, HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamilton v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2017cv01230
Petitioner:
Parris Hamilton
Respondent:
State Of Delaware, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center and Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdus Hamilton v. Administrator East Jersey Stat, et al
as 17-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUS SAMAD HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
LEWIS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2017cv00330
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JAMES LEWIS, DARILYNN KNAUSS, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAMILTON v. NOGAN et al
as 3:2016cv05705
Petitioner:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAMILTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv00804
Petitioner:
BRIAN HAMILTON
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gary Hamilton v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 15-3346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
