Cases 21 - 30 of 124
James Kelley v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 16-3319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
KELLY v. JOHNSON
as 2:2016cv02553
Petitioner:
DUANE KELLY
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KELLY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2015cv03932
Petitioner:
EUGENE I. KELLY
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. US Department of Justice
as 1:2015cv00382
Petitioner:
Aaron Herbert Kelly
Respondent:
US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Zickefoose
as 1:2015cv00532
Petitioner:
Jessie Kelly
Respondent:
Donna Zickefoose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ORTEGA v. KELLY et al
as 1:2015cv01253
Petitioner:
GIRSON J. ORTEGA
Respondent:
LINDA L. KELLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hassan Austin v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 15-1369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HASSAN AUSTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and LINDA L. KELLY
GRIGGS v. BANACH et al
as 5:2015cv00653
Petitioner:
BARRETT Q. GRIGGS
Respondent:
KELLY BANACH, DAVID HOWELLS and RONALD MANESCU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STRICKLAND v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2014cv07164
Petitioner:
DILEEF STRICKLAND
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA L. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHIPLEY v. CAPOZZA et al
as 3:2014cv00202
Petitioner:
JOHN R. SHIPLEY
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA , KELLY CALLIHAN and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
