Cases 21 - 30 of 1,477
PEEK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2024cv00707
Petitioner:
MARLON PEEK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOPER v. UNITED STATES
as 3:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
SONNIE L. COOPER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
GONZALEZ v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
WILLIAM GONZALEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ros Lazo v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Alexander Ros Lazo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gerrett Conover v. United States Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1081
Plaintiff:
GERRETT CONOVER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI
MARCANO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MARCANO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN OF FCI MEKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TUMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
JEFFERY TUMER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN FCI HAZELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MARCANO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MARCANO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Julio Aviles, Sr. v. USA
as 23-3224
Plaintiff:
JULIO AVILES, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv05048
Petitioner:
NORMAN BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
