Cases 31 - 40 of 51
FLORES v. RAMOS et al
as 3:2012cv04818
Petitioner:
ALEXIS REYES FLORES
Respondent:
V. RAMOS, ERIC HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2012cv00172
Petitioner:
RAMOS SANTOS RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW, CHERYL GILL and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santos Rodriguez v. York County Court of Common Pl
as 12-1216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANTOS RAMOS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
YORK COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Rodriguez v. Court of Common Pleas of York County et al
as 1:2011cv02267
Petitioner:
Santos Ramos Rodriguez
Respondent:
Court of Common Pleas of York County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juan Ramos-Rodriguez v. Warden FCI Fort Dix
as 11-2967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN C. RAMOS-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
RAMOS-LARA v. DECKER et al
as 3:2011cv00782
Respondent:
Thomas R. Decker , John P. Torres , Janet Napolitano and others
Petitioner:
Pedro Ramos-Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAMOS-LARA v. DECKER et al
as 2:2011cv01995
Petitioner:
PEDRO RAMOS-LARA
Respondent:
THOMAS R. DECKER , JOHN P. TORRES , JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jose Ramos v. Jerome Walsh, et al
as 11-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEROME WALSH, Superintendent SCI Dallas, DA WARREN CTY and ATTY GEN PA
NIEVES-RAMOS v. ROZUM et al
as 1:2010cv01730
Petitioner:
Jose Nieves-ramos
Respondent:
Gerald L. Rozum, Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and District Attorney of the County of Dauphin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miguel Ramos v. Comm NJ Dept Corr, et al
as 10-3445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMM NJ DEPT CORR and ATTY GEN NJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
