Cases 41 - 50 of 87
KING v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv00677
Petitioner:
JEROME KING
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arnold King v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 13-4343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD KING
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
King v. Bickell et al
as 3:2013cv02118
Petitioner:
Robert King, III
Respondent:
Tabb Bickell and PA State Attorney General
Defendant:
York County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Tritt et al
as 3:2013cv02045
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar King
Respondent:
Brenda Tritt and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. COLEMAN
as 2:2013cv02624
Petitioner:
JEROME KING
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2013cv00477
Petitioner:
LESLIE R. KING
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GARY M. LANIGAN and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2013cv00055
Petitioner:
LESLIE R. KING
Respondent:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JEFFREY CHEISA and STATE OF NEW JEREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James King v. Jerome Walsh
as 12-4082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD KING
Defendant - Appellee:
JEROME WALSH
KING v. WALSH
as 2:2012cv00805
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD KING
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin King v. Michael Hall, et al
as 11-4463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HALL, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
