Cases 41 - 50 of 108
SANCHEZ v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2016cv00226
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DOBSON v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
KASEEN DOBSON
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv01211
Petitioner:
DANIEL KEITH MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRE-TRIAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CROCKETT v. WINGARD
as 3:2016cv00104
Petitioner:
IVAN MARSHALL CROCKETT
Respondent:
TREVOR A. WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kyle Costello v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 16-1696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYLE COSTELLO
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC and UNITED STATES MARSHALS
BANKS v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2016mc00079
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
MARK HORNAK, ORLANDO HARPER, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAMOS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES et al
as 5:2015cv06360
Petitioner:
JOSEPH LUIS RAMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES, SANDRA BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01256
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, JIM BRENNAN and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Justin Credico v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 15-3226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FBI PHILADELPHIA DIVISION and others
CREDICO v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2015cv04198
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Defendant:
DAVID ORTIZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILADELPHIA FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
