Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Pierce v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2023cv01072
Petitioner:
Sidney-James T. Pierce
Respondent:
State of Delaware and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erskine v. Pierce et al
as 1:2023cv00294
Petitioner:
Justine Erskine and Justin Erskine
Defendant:
Special Assistant Kathleen Jennings
Respondent:
David Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PIERCE v. HARRY et al
as 2:2020cv02016
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
Petitioner:
SAMUEL L. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PIERCE v. MARSH et al
as 2:2020cv03843
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, D.A OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY and DR. ROBERT MARSH
Petitioner:
BRANDON TREMAYNE PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cropper v. Metzger et al
as 1:2020cv00005
Respondent:
Deputy Security Ward Paul Pierce Parker, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Warden Dana Metzger
Petitioner:
Dwayne E. Cropper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MOLINA v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2019cv06110
Petitioner:
DOWAYNE MOLINA
Respondent:
WARDEN MCFADDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NICHOLAS J CASENTRA JR, KEVIN P. PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark Rivera v. David Pierce, et al
as 17-3198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID PIERCE and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Washington v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00601
Petitioner:
Michael T. Washington
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2017cv02961
Petitioner:
BRYANT BANKS, SR.
Respondent:
DAVID PIERCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
