Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Cheadle v. Thompson
as 1:2021cv00480
Respondent:
Warden R. Thompson
Petitioner:
Abdul Latif Hawkins Cheadle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilette Hawkins v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 16-3435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GILLETTE HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
HAWKINS v. D.O.C.
as 2:2016cv00885
Petitioner:
TRAVIS HAWKINS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FAYETTE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAWKINS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2016cv02321
Petitioner:
VINCENT HAWKINS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY and CINDY SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Warden, SCI - Huntingdon et al
as 3:2015cv00755
Petitioner:
Robert Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden, SCI - Huntingdon, PA Parole Board and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
V.H. v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv03057
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
VERNON HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAWKINS v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv07319
Petitioner:
VINCENT HAWKINS
Respondent:
PAUL LAGANA, JOHN HOFFMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAWKINS v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2013cv01189
Petitioner:
LARRY WAYNE HAWKINS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Hawkins v. Tabb Bickell, et al
as 13-3303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
TABB BICKELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00564
Petitioner:
Terrence Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
