Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Williams v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00786
Petitioner:
Roger Kent Williams
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jeffrey Kent v. Attorney General Delaware, et al
as 22-1778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY KENT
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Kent v. Metzger et al
as 1:2018cv01760
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Kent
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Delaware and Dana Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
as 1:2017cv05791
Petitioner:
KENT CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THEODAT v. DECKER et al
as 3:2016cv00237
Petitioner:
RONALD THEODAT
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, KENT J. FREDERICK and ASSISTANT CHIEF COUNSEL IN CHARGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AZOR v. DECKER et al
as 3:2016cv00222
Petitioner:
PIERRE RICHARD AZOR
Respondent:
THOMAS DECKER, KENT J. FREDERICK and ASSISTANT CHIEF COUNSEL IN CHARGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Owens v. Overmeyer, et al
as 1:2015cv02243
Petitioner:
Kent Owens
Respondent:
Michael Overmeyer, Attorney General of PA and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Petko v. Gerry Kent, et al
as 13-3927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PETKO
Defendant - Appellee:
GERRY KENT, et al., ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
DICKSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv03259
Petitioner:
JAMES ELIJAH DICKSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, KENT D. WATKINS and KAREN NOONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PETKO v. KENT et al
as 5:2011cv01948
Petitioner:
DAVID PETKO
Respondent:
GERRY KENT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
