Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gerrett Conover v. United States Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1081
Plaintiff:
GERRETT CONOVER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI
DELAVAN v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
BYRON HALE DELAVAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN, FCI and FCP, MCKEAN and CMC ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CONSTANTINE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Petitioner:
LEROY CONSTANTINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN L. HUTCHINSIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Folk v. Howard et al
as 3:2021cv01986
Petitioner:
Omar Folk
Respondent:
Catricia Howard and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BUTT v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Petitioner:
OMAR BUTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN V. MOSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HASLER v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv01164
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
SAMUEL HASLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castillo-Campos v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv01828
Petitioner:
Serafin Castillo-Campos
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SCHMURA v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2016cv08686
Petitioner:
PAUL JOSEPH SCHMURA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ZAKHARENKO v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 3:2016cv00183
Petitioner:
IVAN VALERIYEVICH ZAKHARENKO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spigelman v. Oddo et al
as 3:2016cv00848
Petitioner:
Joel Spigelman
Respondent:
Oddo, United States Bureau of Prisons and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
