Cases 91 - 100 of 333
BAUMHAMMERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01022
Petitioner:
RICHARD BAUMHAMMERS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , ROBERT D. GILMORE , STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIAMOND v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv04389
Petitioner:
ROBERT DIAMOND
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seifullah Abdul-Salaam v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 14-9001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEIFULLAH ABDUL-SALAAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and others
SAM v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv03111
Petitioner:
THAVIRAK SAM
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LYONS v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2014cv03012
Petitioner:
GLENN LYONS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrish v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2014cv00966
Petitioner:
Michael John Parrish
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Robert Gilmore and Steven Glunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOLLAR v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00566
Petitioner:
PATRICK JASON STOLLAR
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT D. GILMORE, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANCHEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv02231
Petitioner:
ALFONSO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
RONEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv02083
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER RONEY
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00103
Petitioner:
LEWIS M. JORDAN
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LOUIS FOLINO, MARIROSA LAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
