Cases 111 - 120 of 24,693
Edward Sartoris v. Haidle, et al
as 24-1871
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SARTORIS
Defendant:
WARDEN HAIDLE, SGT. ZITO, Correctional Officer and DEPUTY WARDEN MCCOY
Pearson, Jr. v. Danfelt et al
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K. Danfelt, Dave Ernest, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FELICIANO v. BALATGEK et al
as 5:2024cv02010
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE S. FELICIANO
Defendant:
OFFICER KAILA BALATGEK and THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. PFURSICH et al
as 5:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
AARON BLAKE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
EDWIN GEORGE PFURSICH, IV and CODY PFURSICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BARRAZA et al
as 2:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM LATEEF RAKIM SMITH
Defendant:
CARLOS BARRAZA, BRIAN MCCARTHY, PATRICK CARMODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Talutto et al
as 4:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Talutto, Warden Pigga and Jason Lando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IVANCICH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv04229
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID IVANCICH and MICHAEL D. IVANCICH
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JUSTIN PINTO, AHMED JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLAGRAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06523
Plaintiff:
JEREMY VILLAGRAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAUERWINE v. HOLIHAN et al
as 5:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SAUERWINE
Defendant:
GAVIN P. HOLIHAN and RICHARD COBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODWARD v. TREJO et al
as 1:2024cv02660
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WOODWARD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TREJO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ALVERADO, SERGEANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
