Cases 11 - 20 of 633
Rolando Muniz v. USA, et al
as 24-1028
Plaintiff:
RONALDO MUNIZ and ROLANDO MUNIZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DR. ABIGAIL LOPEZ-DE LASALLE
BONEY v. NORTHERN STATE PRISON et al
as 2:2023cv23242
Plaintiff:
RAHSHAD BONEY
Defendant:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CIPOLLA v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv23149
Plaintiff:
LEONARD J. CIPOLLA
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. United States
as 4:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
James E. Murphy
Defendant:
Ms. White, N.C. English, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clyde Pontefract v. BOP, et al
as 23-3142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE PONTEFRACT
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, Supervisor, Fort Dix
Marcellus Washington v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office/General, et al
as 23-3083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCELLUS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Thomas Waters v. BOP, et al
as 23-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY POLLUCK, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY FLORENCE and others
SMITH v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2023cv20593
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. SMITH
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Fields v. BOP, et al
as 23-2479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW FIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, PAEDRO, Educational Supervisor, GILIGAN, Correctional Officer and others
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Iklas R. Davis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Staff of FCI-Schuylkill, Warden Beth Rickard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
