Cases 11 - 20 of 96
Roland Graham v. David Rudovsky, et al
as 22-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND GRAHAM
Defendant:
DAVID RUDOVSKY, SUSAN LIN, KAIRYS RUDOVSKY and others
GRAHAM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv20773
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS W. GRAHAM
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCUS O. HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera v. Warden Akinbayo et al.
as 1:2021cv01737
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rivera
Defendant:
Warden Akinbayo, Staff Lt. Warren, Staff Lt. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. RUDOVSKY et al
as 2:2021cv02759
Plaintiff:
ROLAND GRAHAM and RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
MESSING, FEINBERG & LIN, DILP, DAVID RUDOVSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 2:2021cv00449
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PATRICK HOMER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PALLIPURATH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv04567
Defendant:
HAVIS INC., DR. COFFMAN, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M PALLIPURATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv01057
Defendant:
NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and MALACHI BRANTLEY
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. EARL
as 2:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
ROLAND GRAHAM and RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
DOUGLAS P. EARL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Graham v. Mark Rowe, et al
as 21-1053
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ROWE and CITY OF VINELAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA MICHAEL GRAHAM
ROBINSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04525
Plaintiff:
LAMAR ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, REGINALD GRAHAM, PHILA. POLICE OFF. JEFFREY WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
