Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hagan v. Harry et al
as 1:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
Damont Hagan
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, U/K Gourley, U/K Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrence Yoast v. Borough of Pottstown, et al
as 22-1960
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRENCE R. YOAST
Defendant / Appellee:
BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PA d/b/d MCCF, RYAN VANDORICK, INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY and others
EL v. MOSES et al
as 1:2022cv02421
Plaintiff:
KAL SHAREEF EL
Defendant:
KEVIN R. MOSES, JUDGE NANCY RIDGWAY, CARY SHILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISLAAM v. KUBICKI et al
as 1:2020cv00296
Arbitrator:
prose tracking nefpsRBK
Defendant:
CO Kubicki, LT. Bodge, Stein and others
Plaintiff:
Santo M. Islaam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Gray et al
as 1:2020cv00219
Defendant:
TWP-Borough-Police Department of Yadon, Pennsylvania, Gregory Carbaugh, Gregory Piotica and others
Plaintiff:
Damion Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Driggers v. DOC SCI-Camp Hill et al
as 3:2020cv00212
Defendant:
Bernard Panasiewicz, Dr. Elicia Stein, Keith Carberry and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Driggers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. D.O.C. SCI - Camp Hill et al
as 3:2020cv00145
Defendant:
Deb Alvord, Tonya Hast, Gregory Carborough and others
Plaintiff:
William Wright, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISLAAM v. KUBICKI et al
as 1:2019cv21407
Defendant:
LT. BODGE, STEIN, E. BRADELY and others
Plaintiff:
SANTO M. ISLAAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Butler v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 14-4110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, HARDEN, Assistant District Attorney and others
Calvin Butler v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-3296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, HARDEN, Assistant District Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
