Cases 11 - 20 of 28
DEJESUS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07055
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN DEJESUS, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06769
Plaintiff:
HECTOR LUIS DEJESUS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEJESUS TORRES v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv04576
Plaintiff:
JUAN CARLOS DEJESUS TORRES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAUR v. LAUGHINGHOUSE et al
as 2:2016cv02281
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BAUR
Defendant:
B. LAUGHINGHOUSE, DEJESUS, S. SUDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dejesus et al v. The State of Delaware et al
as 1:2015cv01065
Plaintiff:
Orlando DeJesus and Paulette DeJesus
Defendant:
The State of Delaware, Todd Drace, John Kirlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REDDY v. CHRISTIAN et al
as 2:2015cv04930
Plaintiff:
KEITH REDDY
Defendant:
S. CHRISTIAN, "JANE DOE, BEUFORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Robinson v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 15-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY F. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, LT. TRADER, LT. MARK D. DAUM and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, MAJOR SCAROBOROUGH, STAFF LT. KAREN HAWKINS and others
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL
as 2:2014cv06340
Defendant:
MICHELE FARRELL, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2014cv06094
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
MICHELE FARRELL, DEJESUS, K. PAONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David DeJesus, Sr. v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 14-1282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID DEJESUS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, WILLIAM JOYCE and DANA BAKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
