Cases 11 - 20 of 52
MASON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
WADE MASON
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, GEORGE M. LITTLE, George Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLEDGE v. BOLT et al
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
LARRY ALLEN SLEDGE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SHAWN BOLT, COUNSELOR HEATHER MARTIN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RYAN TARASOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MORGAN v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE et al
as 2:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
ADAM E. MORGAN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE, JOHN LANKEY, ANGELA KERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YAGLA v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE et al
as 2:2021cv01242
Plaintiff:
BART M YAGLA, JR. and BART M. YAGLA, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE, JOHN LENKEY, JOE BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SPADA v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2020cv00223
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT RICCI, FRANK QUINN, CAPTAIN FUNKHOUSER and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SPADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00496
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ORLANDO HARPER
Plaintiff:
HEATHER CONNOLLY, ALEXUS DIGGS and MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCUTELLA v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2019cv00354
Defendant:
MARCELL MALLORY, KEVEN STUTTER, KATHY GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. MURIN et al
as 1:2018cv00228
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER LUTZ, JANA JORDAN, CHAPLAIN KOSAREK and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ALI v. DUPONT et al
as 2:2018cv00665
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, MICHAEL OVERMYER, DERRICK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00307
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHEAL D. OVERMYER, SARAH SIEGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
