Cases 11 - 20 of 21
WILSON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2014cv01654
Plaintiff:
JAMAR WILSON
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 2:2013cv03182
Plaintiff:
GEORGE COLEMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Forrest v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 13-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
FORREST v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, MAURIN, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KERRY X [MARSHALL] v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
Kerry X [marshall]
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey A. Beard, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE NATION OF ISLAM et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
THE NATION OF ISLAM, MUHAMMAD'S TEMPLE OF ISLAM and KERRY X [MARSHALL]
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Perez-Rivera v. Brent Thorton, et al
as 11-1834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN A. PEREZ-RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT A. THORTON, NICHOLSON, JOHN DOE, I and others
SEVER v. PERRIN et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. SEVER
Defendant:
THOMAS PERRIN, ADELE BAUER, TIFFANY CINKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ-RIVERA v. THORTON et al
as 1:2010cv00291
Plaintiff:
BRYAN A. PEREZ-RIVERA
Defendant:
BRENT A. THORTON, NICHOLSON, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Trader et al
as 1:2010cv00827
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Michael S. Trader, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
