Cases 11 - 20 of 25
SANDERS v. OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 3:2016cv05380
Plaintiff:
MICHOLE SANDERS
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, OCEAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05986
Plaintiff:
JEROME MILLS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2013cv02157
Plaintiff:
MARC ANTHONY JAMES ARNOLD
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, EDWARD SWEENEY, CINDY EQIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Verbanik v. Michael Harlow
as 12-3887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. VERBANIK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, MICHEL SCHULLER, JASON ANDREWS and others
Troy Rogers v. Mills, et al
as 12-3777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY LAMONT ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE MILLS, (RET) BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLIC DEPT., BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and UNKNOWN OFFICERS & DEA AGENTS
ROGERS v. MILLS et al
as 2:2011cv04706
Plaintiff:
TROY LAMONT ROGERS
Defendant:
MILLS, BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. and UNKNOWN OFFICERS & DEA AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
Virginia Davis
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Tom Carrol, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2010cv05884
Plaintiff:
ALAN BRUCE MILLS
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Verbanik v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 10-2522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. VERBANIK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, Superintendent, MICHEL SCHULLER, C/O, JASON ANDREWS, C/O and others
BRANCH v. MILLS, et al
as 2:2010cv01860
Plaintiff:
KEITH BRANCH
Defendant:
MILLS and MR. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
