Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Ivan Davis v. Berks Cty, et al
as 10-4038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN BLAIR DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BERKS CTY, BERKS CTY PRISON, JAMES COOPER, CORRECTION OFFICER and others
Franklin Smith v. Philip Morgan, et al
as 10-3898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILIP MORGAN, SOULETTE, MCREYNOLDS and others
Rathy v. Rendell, et al
as 10-3120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE FRANKLIN RATHY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, ATTY GEN PA, Esquire, Office of the Attorney General, JEFFREY B. MILLER, Commissioner and others
RATHY v. RENDALL et al
as 2:2010cv00802
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FRANKLIN RATHY, SR.
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDALL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR., JEFFREY B. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANKLIN v. DELANEY
as 2:2010cv02965
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE FRANKLIN
Defendant:
DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Morgan et al
as 1:2010cv00432
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Smith
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Soulette, McReynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOPP v. BEARD et al
as 1:2010cv00714
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Kopp
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Franklin J. Tennis, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KOPP v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv01257
Plaintiff:
EDWARD G. KOPP
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, ROBERT MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURROWS v. BEARD et al
as 1:2009cv00314
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. BURROWS
Defendant:
JEFFERY BEARD, FRANKLIN TENNIS, MILLCREEK P. DEPT. OF ERIE, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TYRONE-ANTHONY et al v. KNAUER et al
as 2:2009cv02796
Plaintiff:
TYRONE-ANTHONY, SANDRA HASSETE and WANDA DENISE HUNT
Defendant:
JULIE KNAUER, ARIAS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
