Cases 31 - 40 of 401
MARTIN v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
HASSAN MARTIN
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, WARDEN JOHN LANKEY, SGT. ANTHONY DRAGONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. PABON et al
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
CHCA EDWARDS, DR. BAIRD, PA STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcellus Jones v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 23-1999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE, DENISE SMITH, JAMES BRESHAHN and others
JONES v. BALLTYNE et al
as 5:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
BYRON MASON JONES, JR.
Defendant:
LT. BALLTYNE, C.O. BAROFSKI, LT. POLDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. FABIAN et al
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant:
FABIAN and FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
DAVON JONES and CORDELL YOUNG
Defendant:
SERGEANT WALTERS and SERGEANT HEIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG, et al. v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
CORDELL YOUNG and DAVON JONES
Defendant:
SERGEANT WALTERS and SERGEANT HEIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SWINT v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SWINT
Defendant:
L.J. OLIVER, EARL JONES, MRS. RANDELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PALMA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
ALDO PALMA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, L. J. ODDO, D. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTER v. PRIME CARE et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
AARON WALTER
Defendant:
PRIME CARE, BLAIR COUNTY PRISON and TIFFANY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
