Cases 31 - 40 of 60
KNIGHT v. MURPHY, et al
as 2:2012cv00984
Plaintiff:
MELVIN KNIGHT
Defendant:
FLOYD MURPHY, STEVEN CMAR and JOHN R. WALTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crichlow v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv00303
Plaintiff:
Keino S. Crichlow
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
COOPER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05314
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON COOPER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, M. LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALVAREZ et al v. BROCKENBERG et al
as 2:2011cv05086
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALVAREZ, JAMES MCCANTS and STEVEN MASTER
Defendant:
BROCKENBERG, DELANEY, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. JOHN DOE I et al
as 2:2011cv04877
Plaintiff:
MELVIN W. GREEN
Defendant:
RICHARD PAULLMAN, CARROLL FORREST, JUAN ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYNES v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FALCILATY et al
as 2:2011cv04530
Plaintiff:
DAVID HAYNES
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FALCILATY, KNIGHT, SMALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERION v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
THURMAN MERION
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, ROBERT B. MACINTYRE, F. NUNEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON STAFF et al
as 2:2011cv01618
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON STAFF, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
