Cases 61 - 70 of 212
SNIDER v. WITTIG et al
as 2:2018cv00703
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT WITTIG, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, SHELLY MANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
KASHKASHIAN v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2018cv01591
Plaintiff:
ERIC KASHKASHIAN
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA, ABBY CASSIDY and UNKNOWN NAME - PRISON DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHEELER v. DEBOVOW et al
as 2:2018cv01278
Defendant:
H. D.E.B. DEBUVOW, ELEBY, PUTMAN and others
Plaintiff:
AARON CHRISTOPHER WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. WETZEL, et al
as 2:2018cv00230
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, TRACY SHAWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. BEDFORD COUNTY et al
as 3:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SCOTT MILLER
Defendant:
BEDFORD COUNTY , BEDFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , TROY NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAIBY v. LINK et al
as 5:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY V. CAIBY
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, GEORGE ONDREJKA, MAJOR OF THE GUARD TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
MAURICE M. PRICE
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, DAN CARO, COWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGLINCHEY v. S.C.I. FAYETTE et al
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MCGLINCHEY
Defendant:
S.C.I. FAYETTE, JOHN UNKNOWN, BRIAN V. COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. FRAZIER et al
as 3:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL FRAZIER, UNKNOWN NAMED REGIONAL DIRECTOR, Baltazar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TALLEY v. IONOTA et al
as 2:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
IONOTA, D. ROBERTSON, TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.