Cases 1 - 10 of 18
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
HILL v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HILL
Defendant:
WARDEN RANDY IRWIN, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, SERGEANT J.T. KRAFCZYNSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. Weaver et al
as 4:2020cv00929
Defendant:
C Weaver, Unknown Tutino, J Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BURKHART v. LACKEY et al
as 2:2017cv00906
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BURKHART
Defendant:
MS. LACKEY, ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTER v. GAUDENZIA DRC, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03515
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUSTER
Defendant:
GAUDENZIA DRC, INC., PAT O'CONNER, BARBARA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sean Pressley v. C. Blaine, et al
as 12-3888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN PRESSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE
Bridgeforth v. New Castle County Family Court et al
as 1:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Bridgeforth
Defendant:
New Castle County Family Court, Howard R. Young Correctional Institution Warden, Todd E. Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Sykes et al
as 1:2010cv00739
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Brown
Defendant:
Sykes, Conner, Workmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
