Prison Condition Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
ATKINSON v. APODACA
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ATKINSON
Defendant: CAPTAIN APODACA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HILDERBAND, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00063
Plaintiff: WAYNE EASLEY and WARREN EASLEY
Defendant: MONGILUZZO, JOHN BLICHA, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EASLEY v. OBERLANDER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00156
Plaintiff: WARREN EASLEY
Defendant: JOHN VETZEL, ERNIE MANGELUZZO, DR. WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VICTOR v. OVERMYER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00366
Plaintiff: WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant: COUNSELOR HOPKINS, LT. WALKER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
QADR v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01443
Plaintiff: NUR QADR
Defendant: BRIAN V. COLEMAN, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CESERINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archie Tindell v. Secretary PA Dept Corr, et al
as 13-3832
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. SKUNDA, M. LUCAS and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee: E. APODACA and HAGGERTY
MOORE v. ADAMS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff: JUSTIN LATIK MOORE
Defendant: DENNIS CLAYTON ADAMS, II, GILL, D.J. ROOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINDELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00173
Plaintiff: ARCHIE TINDELL
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WENTEL, DEBRA SAUERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?