Cases 1 - 10 of 35
BUSH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv02216
Plaintiff:
GERALD BUSH
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS, LT. YOST, SUPERINTENDENT HEINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 2:2022cv03077
Plaintiff:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS, LT. YOST, SUPERINTENDENT HEINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01443
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RUSSELL ANDREWS, SR.
Defendant:
CO1 PELUS, COIIII SHEEDER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JAMES v. BUSH et al
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JAMES
Defendant:
BUSH, J. M. BOYLES and B. D. HEIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LITTLE v. BUSH
as 2:2017cv01512
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN B. LITTLE
Defendant:
ERIC BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARROW v. BUSH et al
as 2:2017cv01169
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS FARROW
Defendant:
ERIC P. BUSH, EVANICHKO, MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WINN v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE WINN
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION PINE GROVE, SUPT. ERIC P. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. KENNEY et al
as 2:2017cv02867
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON BUSH
Defendant:
JIM KENNEY, MICHAEL RESNICK and GERALD MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08314
Plaintiff:
ELGIN C. BUSH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
