Cases 1 - 10 of 36
WOODLEY v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv04680
Plaintiff:
RONALD WOODLEY
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY, JOSEPH TERRA, MS. COLON-ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS et al v. SUPERVISOR SHANNON et al
as 2:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RYAN WILLIAMS, SUPERVISOR SHANNON, SUPERVISOR MAYNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
DANTE JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH INC., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LISA CRESPO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. COLON-ORTIZ et al
as 2:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
STEPHON M BENNETT
Defendant:
ADIDELYS COLON-ORTIZ, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ-COLON v. MARLER et al
as 2:2020cv04083
Plaintiff:
FERNANDINO RODRIGUEZ-COLON
Defendant:
SEAN MARLER, N. MANSI, J. O'BOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLON v. ANGLIKOWSKI et al
as 1:2020cv00036
Defendant:
MR. KNEPPER, SUPT. CAPPOZZA, LT. BASHIER and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS COLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ESTATE OF STERLING COLE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv03924
Defendant:
ROBERT D TAYLOR, GERALD MAY, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF STERLING COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARROYO v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv02667
Plaintiff:
JORGE LUIS ARROYO
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVID PENCHISEN, DANIEL S. KEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLON v. COUNTY OF BUCKS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00822
Plaintiff:
FERNANDINO COLON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUCKS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOFFMAN HALL BUILDING B
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLON v. OWENS
as 1:2017cv00900
Plaintiff:
NIJEE COLON
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
