Cases 1 - 10 of 11
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
JACKSON v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
ABDU JACKSON
Defendant:
WELLPATH, DR. DAVID SMITH, CRNP LESLIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2020cv00316
Defendant:
DERECK OBERLANDER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN DAVID SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ENTITY et al
as 2:2015cv00931
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ENTITY, MICHAEL NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM PPS CFCF CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv02505
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Laughlin v. Peck, et al
as 13-2165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL LAUGHLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PECK, DAVID SMITH, KIRK HENDERSON and others
DOTY v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DOTY
Defendant:
BARRY SNYDER, DOMINIC DILULLO, DAVID SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. SMITH et al
as 1:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. REED, SR.
Defendant:
DAVID SMITH and MORE OFFICER INVOLVED ON NEGLIGENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Laughlin v. Susan Senchak, et al
as 12-1018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL LAUGHLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PECK, DAVID SMITH, KIRK HENDERSON and others
LAUGHLIN v. PECK et al
as 1:2010cv00213
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LAUGHLIN
Defendant:
PECK, DAVID SMITH, KIRK HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
