Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JAMES v. BUSH et al
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JAMES
Defendant:
BUSH, J. M. BOYLES and B. D. HEIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. POSKA et al
as 2:2015cv01493
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
POSKA, C. PARKER, BRIAN COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TARSELLI v. HARKLAND et al
as 2:2013cv01824
Plaintiff:
TODD (HYUNG-RAE) TARSELLI
Defendant:
HARKLAND , J. M. SMITH , HAYWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Taylor v. Joseph Visinsky, et al
as 12-4156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. VISINSKY, Corrections Health Care Administrator, DENISE THOMAS, Registered Nurse/Acting Corrections Health Care Admnistrator, JACK DEPNER, Medical Doctor and others
Joseph Taylor v. Joseph Visinsky, et al
as 10-3835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. VISINSKY, CHCA, DENISE THOMAS, RN Acting CHCA, JACK DEPNER, DMD and others
SLOAN v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, HEIDI SROKA, DAWN DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
DONALD MURPHY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON, SECURITY CAPTAIN PIRIZOLLA, SECURITY LT. HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCINTOSH v. GLEN et al
as 1:2009cv00295
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. MCINTOSH
Defendant:
GLEN, RODNEY SMITH, DERRICK MEBANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, DIANE THOMAS, DANIEL DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG et al v. J.D. AND REC et al
as 2:2007cv04245
Plaintiff:
KEVIN YOUNG and TYRIE BRINSON
Defendant:
J.D. AND REC, HOLLOMEN, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
