Cases 1 - 10 of 14
VITKA v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00220
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WOLTON, PREA COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE VITKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
David Brown v. John Williams, et al
as 15-3419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WILLIAMS, Parole Agent at SCI-Albion, MICHAEL CARRINGTON, Parole Supervisor at SCI-Albion, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, PBPP, Secretary and others
HENDERSON v. WETZEL, ET AL et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
FRANCOIS HENDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ET AL, NANCY A. GIROUX, ET AL, MELINDA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2013cv00331
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN WILLIAMS, MICHAEL CARRINGTON, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilton Mincy v. William McConnell, et al
as 12-3463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HILTON KARRIEM MINCY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. MCCONNELL, K. SUTTER, ROD SHOWERS and others
SHOWERS v. ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 1:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY B. SHOWERS
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and JACK DANERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOWERS v. PENN. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY B. SHOWERS
Defendant:
PENN. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ERIE COUNTY EXECUTIVE/COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOWERS v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY SHOWERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW and CHERYL GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Laughlin v. Susan Senchak, et al
as 12-1018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL LAUGHLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PECK, DAVID SMITH, KIRK HENDERSON and others
CARTER v. HARLOW et al
as 1:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS E. CARTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW, RICHARD M. HALL, RONALD J. BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
