Cases 1 - 10 of 14
IN RE: WARNER, SR.
as 2:2022cv00985
In Re:
EQUAN J. WARNER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CULMER v. WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01683
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE LAMONT CULMET and ANTOINE LAMONT CULMER
Defendant:
WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WARNER v. GLUNT et al
as 3:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
LEVON T. WARNER
Defendant:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, DEBRA YOUNKIN, MUHAMMAD J. NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARNER v. MANGOLD et al
as 2:2014cv01503
Plaintiff:
LEVON T. WARNER
Defendant:
PATRICK MANGOLD, PITTS, CURRAN FROMHAND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (MED. DEPT.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY JEFFREY BEARD et al
as 3:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SECRETARY JEFFREY A. BEARD, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. WARNER et al
as 2:2012cv04956
Plaintiff:
ERIC RICHARDSON
Defendant:
WARNER, TOOMER, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENNIS v. MR. WEAVER et al
as 2:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HENNIS
Defendant:
MR. WEAVER, MR. VANCE, MR. JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. TRITT et al
as 2:2012cv02573
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. DAVIS
Defendant:
BRENDA TRITT, GAVIN, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, MARILYN S. BROOKS, PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adbullah Hubbard, et al v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 10-1886
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ADBULLAH G. HUBBARD, NORMAN INGRAM, JAMES A. WILSON and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
