Cases 11 - 17 of 17
LODGE NO. 5 OF THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv03256
Plaintiff:
LODGE NO. 5 OF THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE , COPPAC , DAVID BYRNE and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , MICHAEL A. NUTTER , BOARD OF ETHICS OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Wentz v. Morgan Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01572
Plaintiff:
Laura C. Wentz
Defendant:
Morgan Corporation, Norbert Markert and Steve Baker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Karen Camesi, et al v. Univ Pgh Med Ctr, et al
as 10-1096
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAREN CAMESI, ERIN O'CONNELL, LORI SHAFFER and others
Defendant - Non-Participating:
MEDICAL 10-1096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY C. HENDERSON
CAMESI et al v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 3:2009cv00085
Plaintiff:
KAREN CAMESI, ERIN O'CONNELL, LORI SHAFFER and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, UPMC, UPMC HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MITCHELL et al v. APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv02915
Plaintiff:
GILBERT MITCHELL, CHRISTOPHER ALBERTSON, MARK ANKNER and others
Defendant:
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY, AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P. and NHP MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
STILLMAN v. STAPLES, INC.
as 2:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Alison H. Rubin, Matthew Douthilt, CHRISTOPHER AGOSTINO and others
Defendant:
STAPLES, INC., TONI C. LEONARD and Billie Jo Bronson
Receiver:
Andres Calo, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
JOHN HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PATERSON POLICE PBA, et al v. CITY OF PATERSON, et al
as 2:2002cv03802
Plaintiff:
PATERSON POLICE PBA LOCAL 1, PATERSON POLICE PBA LOCAL 1 SUPERIOR OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, DAVID BAIRD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON and JOSE JOEY TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
