Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LIGHTBOURNE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2022cv04888
Plaintiff:
JOHN LIGHTBOURNE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
WALSH v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2022cv02282
Petitioner:
MARTIN J. WALSH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, NANCY MCINTYRE and ERIC THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
MCCALL v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2020cv01282
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY MCCALL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SOMERS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2019cv16323
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCMAHON and TORI MCMAHON
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SOMERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv01634
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Good and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
WEI v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2018cv01038
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff:
XIANGYUN WEI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DILULLO et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2017cv02095
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R DILULLO and JOSEPHINE DILULLO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Elfand v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2015cv06469
Movant:
Jonathan Elfand
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gallagher v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 3:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Darrin Gallagher and Wendy Gallagher
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Billy Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BEY v. CARROLL et al
as 1:2012cv01726
Plaintiff:
STEPHIN PARATUS BEY
Defendant:
MARCIA CARROLL and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
