Cases 41 - 50 of 167
ROESKE et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2020cv02037
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KELLY ROESKE and ERIC ROESKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03232
Defendant:
SUBARU CORPORATION and SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN STONE, SHIRLEY ALBRIGHT, ALLEN KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURDICK v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01415
Plaintiff:
BURDICK and KELLY BURDICK
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUBIN v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00313
Defendant:
MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, JAMES G. BERGES and others
Plaintiff:
BRENDA RUBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDSAY et al v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER H. LINDSAY, JR. and CHARLES R. BLACKBURN
Defendant:
MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, ROBERT RIPP and others
LEE v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00075
Defendant:
MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, JAMES G. BERGES and others
Plaintiff:
L. COURTLAND LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. WAWA, INC.
as 2:2019cv06179
Plaintiff:
JOHN FISHER
Defendant:
WAWA, INC.
Respondent:
JEFFREY BAUMANN, KELLY EMERY, NICHOLAS RAPAK and others
Petitioner:
Mrs. Tabitha Hans-Arroyo
Hans-Arroyo v. WAWA, INC.
as 2:2019cv06127
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Tabitha Hans-Arroyo
Defendant:
WAWA, INC.
Respondent:
JEFFREY BAUMANN, KELLY EMERY, NICHOLAS RAPAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BIOREFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC. v. LOEHR
as 2:2019cv21726
Defendant:
KELLI LOEHR
Plaintiff:
BIOREFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARNER et al v. SWEPI, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. ZINK, JOHN L. STEWART, GILDA GIANCOLA and others
Defendant:
SWEPI, LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
