Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Antonello Boldrini v. Federal National Mortgage Asso, et al
as 19-2515
Defendant / Appellee:
CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, PROF 2013 S3 LEGAL TITLE TRUST II, DONALD KRESESKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
IMAGE MASTERS, INC. et al v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
as 2:2019mc00131
Petitioner:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, SUNTRUST BANK, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN FELDMAN
Defendant:
ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
In Re:
IMAGE MASTERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Boldrini v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2019cv00563
Defendant:
Lesa Gelb, Dave Ritter, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv11663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NAPRSTEK v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11442
Defendant:
GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, BANK OF AMERICA, DT HOLDINGS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUBOS NAPRSTEK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOUSER et al v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 5:2018cv02594
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HOUSER and KELLY HOUSER
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and SETERUS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
