Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,927
Jaycee Wise v. USA
as 24-1570
Petitioner: JAYCEE WISE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roger Real v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1545
Petitioner: ROGER ESTEBAN REAL
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RIFAI v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv01242
Plaintiff: Dr. MUHAMAD ALY RIFAI
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEA ADMINISTRATOR ANNE MILGRAM, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Juan Coreas-Ramirez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1543
Petitioner: JUAN ATILTO COREAS-RAMIREZ
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RIFAI v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2024cv01242
Plaintiff: MUHAMAD ALY RIFAI
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEA ADMINISTRATOR ANNE MILGRAM, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant: APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Petitioner: PHV NICOLE DEMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Nahid Reza, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1504
Petitioner: NAHID REZA, SHIMIN SHABNAM and N. N. N.
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles ClemensIn re: Charles Clemens
as 24-1471
Petitioner: In re: CHARLES CLEMENS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Allaeldin Elhattab v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1482
Petitioner: ALLAELDIN ELHATTAB
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Traumann
as 24-1470
Petitioner: In re: THOMAS TRAUMANN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GENE E. K. PRATTER, District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?