Cases 71 - 80 of 249
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv19323
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv19323
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GURBIR GREWAL and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN ARMORY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Rust Rare Coin Inc. et al
as 1:2019mc00261
Defendant:
R Legacy Entertainment LLC, Rust Rare Coin Inc., Denise Gunderson Rust and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission and State of Utah Division of Securities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION et al v. RUST RARE COIN INC. et al
as 2:2019mc00171
Defendant:
ALEESHA RUST FRANKLIN, RUST RARE COIN INC., DENISE GUNDERSON RUST and others
Plaintiff:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION and STATE OF UTAH DIVISION OF SECURITIES
Not Yet Classified:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN
Rancourt Woodell v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-3285
Defendant:
DR. TOBIN, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. LEWIS, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. GOK, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PANDEYA, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. MOHATA, GRATERFORD MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES, GOROSIKOL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Craig MossIn re: Craig Moss
as 19-3174
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY FRANKLIN COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: CRAIG MOSS
In re: William Himchak, III
as 19-2160
Respondent:
WARDEN BILL BECHTOLD, Franklin County Jail, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MATTHEW D. FOGAL, PRESIDENT JUDGE CAROL VAN HORN and others
Not Yet Classified:
YVETTE KANE
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
