Cases 1 - 9 of 9
USA v. Anthony Percell
as 24-1076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY PERCELL, a/k/a D.S.
Joseph Phillips, Jr. v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 22-2750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH D.S. PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Defendant:
RICHARD JAMES
PHILLIPS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D.S. PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
In re: Joseph Phillips, Jr.
as 17-3659
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH D.S. PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
OFFICER RICHARD JAMES, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSLYVANIA HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION and others
Nominal Respondent:
DAVID S. CERCONE
W.S. & D.S. v. MOUNT OLIVE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2011cv04264
Plaintiff:
W.S. & D.S.
Defendant:
MOUNT OLIVE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
R.S. AND D.S. ON BEHALF OF E.S. v. MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 3:2010cv05265
Plaintiff:
R.S. AND D.S. ON BEHALF OF E.S.
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
D.S., et al v. Bayonne Board of Education
as 08-4730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D.S., Individually and as Guardians ad litem of D.S. and A.S., Individually and as Guardian as litem of D.S.
Defendant - Appellee:
BAYONNE BD OF ED
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. D.S. et al
as 2:2008cv01774
Plaintiff:
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
D.S. and A.S.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
D.S. et al v. BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2008cv01726
Plaintiff:
D.S. and A.S.
Defendant:
BAYONNE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
