Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jane Doe 2, et al v. North Allegheny School Distric, et al
as 22-8006
Respondent:
JANE DOE 2, in her own capacity and as parent of Child Doe 2 and Child Doe 3, JANE DOE 3, in her own capacity and as parent of Child Doe 4 and on behalf of those similarly situated, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Petitioner:
NORTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a Pennsylvania governmental entity, ELIZABETH BLACKBURN, LESLIE BRITTON DOZIER and others
WATERMAN v. ZIX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05339
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
ZIX CORPORATION, MARK J BONNEY, MARCY CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
MELCHIOR et al v. VAGNOZZI et al
as 2:2020cv05562
Defendant:
PILLAR II LIFE SETTLEMENT FUND, L.P., JASON ZWIEBEL, SPARTAN INCOME FUND, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D GROFF, DOMINICK BELLIZZIE, SHAWN P CARLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Curtis v. Rosetta Stone Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01288
Defendant:
Patrick W. Gross, Laurence Franklin, Aedhmar Hynes and others
Plaintiff:
Marcy Curtis
Curtis v. Principia Biopharma Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01164
Defendant:
Simeon George, Sanofi, Kortex Acquisition Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Marcy Curtis
Curtis v. Majesco et al
as 1:2020cv01096
Defendant:
Robert P. Restrepo, Jr., Ketan Mehta, Earl Gallegos and others
Plaintiff:
Marcy Curtis
Joseph Marcy v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 20-1977
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LUZERNE COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH D. MARCY
Curtis v. Wright Medical Group N.V. et al
as 1:2020cv00509
Defendant:
J. Patrick Mackin, Stryker Corporation, David D. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Marcy Curtis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
