Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Dulaney et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
David Dulaney and Anita Dulaney
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
THOMAS v. TURNER et al
as 2:2024cv02494
Plaintiff:
DEISHA THOMAS
Defendant:
NATHAN TURNER and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Raj Patel v. United Parcel Services
as 24-1542
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
CASTILLO et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
ERASMO CASTILLO and ANA GUADALUPE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. doing business as UPS and CASEY P. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Patel v. The United Parcel Services
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel and Raj Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WITMAYER v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv05106
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WITMAYER
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and JOHN DOES (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LeBOON et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv04391
Plaintiff:
PETER LeBOON and PATRICIA LeBOON
Defendant:
BRYAN WILLIAMS, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CERRATO v. BOWMAN et al
as 2:2022cv02349
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE CERRATO
Defendant:
JOHN BOWMAN and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BINGHAM v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
RHONDA BINGHAM
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NADERI v. CONCENTRA HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv18958
Plaintiff:
NADER NADERI
Cross Claimant:
CONCENTRA HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
