Cases 91 - 100 of 455
HILLOCK PROPERTIES LLC et al v. COUNTY OF DELAWARE
as 2:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
HILLOCK PROPERTIES LLC, SOUTH AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERS, HILLOCK REAL ESTATE LLC and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
DENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv20623
Plaintiff:
EMMALEE DENT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCUS HICKS, VICTORIA KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Vonville et al v. Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv01603
Plaintiff:
Philip J Vonville and Joseph J. Vonville
Defendant:
Pocono Mountain Regional Police Department, Tobyhanna Township, Tunkhannock Township and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS-DAVIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2021cv04052
Plaintiff:
RACQUEL LEWIS-DAVIS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BRETT v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2021cv13359
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, WILLIAM BAHP, US ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. TRUMP et al
as 3:2021cv12992
Defendant:
MR. WHEELER, ROBERT RULBERELL, JUDGE GOLDBER and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
