Cases 91 - 100 of 109
JOHNSON v. REALTY ONE PROPERTIES, L.P. et al
as 2:2010cv05246
Plaintiff:
CHENOA JOHNSON
Defendant:
REALTY ONE PROPERTIES, L.P. , DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORP. , DREW DEMARCO and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
DELAWARE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CORP. and DREW DEMARCO
Thirdparty_defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boldrini v. Ponce et al
as 3:2010cv02065
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Carol Ponce, F Cortez Bell, Patrick Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2010cv01246
Plaintiff:
GALEN ARMSTRONG , TIM BARTHELMES , MATT BARTKO and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, NATHAN HARPER, PAUL DONALDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. PERRY et al
as 1:2010cv01372
Plaintiff:
FRANK SHAW
Defendant:
KEVIN PERRY, JASON STETSER, M. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VURIMINDI v. FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
as 2:2010cv00234
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR R. VURIMINDI
Defendant:
FUQUA SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, MOIRA RINGO, DOUGLAS M. BASHAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WALKER v. SHAW
as 3:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
DEREK A. WALKER
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. SHAW, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DIXON et al v. SHAW
as 3:2008cv00147
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DIXON and GREGORY NEEPER
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
