Cases 101 - 110 of 212
Annur Bey v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 14-3173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNUR HASHIM BEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JURY COMMISSIONER, DANIEL RENDIEN, JURY COMMISSION and others
BEY v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv03411
Plaintiff:
ANNUR HASHIM BEY
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE JURY COMMISSION, DANIEL RENDIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BEY et al v. LEVY, et al
as 2:2014cv03648
Plaintiff:
THIERRY-LAMARRE BEY and RICHARD P. LEVY
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KUMANYIKA, DAVID P. SABAGH, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
UR HONOR EL BEY v. ABERDEEN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2014cv01532
Plaintiff:
UR HONOR EL BEY
Defendant:
ABERDEEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATTHEW LLOYD, JOHN YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EUNICE-BEY v. BURY
as 2:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
TYRONE EUNICE-BEY
Defendant:
BRANFORD BURY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick McPherron v. Joseph Carroll, et al
as 13-3184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. CARROLL, District Attorney, JESSICA KRILIVSKY, Assistant District Attorney, JOHN R. MERRICK, Public Defender and others
JONES-BEY v. FAMILY PART CHANCERY DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY
as 2:2013cv04301
Plaintiff:
EARL JONES-BEY
Defendant:
FAMILY PART CHANCERY DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Admiral Ala' Ad-din v. US Dept of Justice, et al
as 13-3036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON L. AMIN-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MAHLON L. FAST, JSC, EUGENE CODEY and others
EUNICE-BEY v. FLORIA
as 2:2013cv03181
Plaintiff:
TYRONE EUNICE-BEY
Defendant:
SALLYANNE FLORIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
