Cases 101 - 110 of 447
Lattimore v. Philadelphia Police Agency et al
as 1:2020cv00856
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Williamsport Police Agency and Philadelphia Police Agency
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Lattimore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. DAVIS, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MORALES VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DORMILUS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv21904
Defendant:
GEORGE O. ROBINSON, JR., D McGee, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
Eddy Dormilus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BARNEY v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv19310
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BARNEY, JR
Defendant:
KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv00274
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MR. OBERLANDER and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
GREENE v. GRAAF et al
as 2:2019cv04734
Defendant:
KENNETH HOLDSMAN, JONATHAN VAN DUSEN, VERIZON NETWORK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
