Cases 11 - 20 of 743
Rafaella Spone v. Matthew Reiss, et al
as 24-1684
Plaintiff:
RAFAELLA MARIE SPONE
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW REISS, LOUIS BELL, TOWNSHIP OF HILLTOWN and others
Parrish v. Muldrow et al
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Donte Darrell Parrish
Defendant:
Mike Muldrow, York County Municipality and Judge Jennifer Clancy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peter Seamon v. Governor Joshua Shapiro, et al
as 24-1451
Plaintiff:
PETER R. SEAMON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, NANCY WALKER, Secretary of Labor & Industry, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY and others
MITROS v. MCCONNELL et al
as 1:2024cv04996
Defendant:
JENNIFER H. MCCONNELL, KEVIN T. MCCONNELL, HOLLY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DAVID MITROS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cotton v. Shalk et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
David Edward Cotton
Defendant:
Jennifer Shalk, Doe 1 and Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
POWELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
BRIDGET POWELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN, NIKKIA PLUNKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
PETER et al v. TAVISTOCK AT MAYS LANDING HOA et al
as 3:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH PETER and ANINA PETER
Defendant:
TAVISTOCK AT MAYS LANDING HOA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, INC., ERIC D. MANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
