Cases 11 - 20 of 41
LOUIS v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL LOUIS
Defendant:
OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, SUSAN LLOYD, KEN NAPAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORALES v. MAXWELL et al
as 3:2021cv07263
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON, CHRISTOPHER HUTTON, TRAVIS MAXWELL and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN MORALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEARRON et al v. RESTUCCIA et al
as 3:2020cv14819
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, SHEILAH A. COLEY, DANIEL SIMPKINS and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN GILES and ANTHONY FEARRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv14766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv14766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DIGIESI v. TOWNSHIP OF BRIDGEWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2019cv14557
Defendant:
JOE BONES, TOM RICE, JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE DIGIESI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TCHATCHOUA v. PETERMAN et al
as 2:2017cv01619
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL TCHATCHOUA
Defendant:
JOHN PETERMAN, BERNARD SCOTT, JEREMY ERKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUGLAS v. MAXWELL REALTY CO. INC.
as 2:2017cv04068
Plaintiff:
LOLITA DUGLAS
Defendant:
MAXWELL REALTY CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEDRO v. CITY FITNESS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03542
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
CITY FITNESS, LLC, WHARTON STREET FITNESS, LLC, WALNUT STREET FITNESS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
