Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
NIAZI v. CHERTOFF
as 2:2007cv01643
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD NIAZI
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LIU v. MUELLER et al
as 2:2007cv05007
Plaintiff:
JIN LIU
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER, EMILIO GONZALEZ and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2007cv05168
Plaintiff:
MEHAR SINGH
Defendant:
ROBERT S. MUELLER, UNKNOWN U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY OR AGENCIES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
EGHTESAD v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01435
Plaintiff:
SOODEH EGHTESAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
EGHTESAD v. CHERTOFF
as 2:2007cv01429
Plaintiff:
SAMAN EGHTESAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
EGHTESAD v. CHERTOFF
as 2:2007cv01431
Plaintiff:
SAREH EGHTESAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
BUDAK v. CHERTOFF
as 2:2007cv01401
Plaintiff:
BARIS BUDAK
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
UKANI v. KEISLER et al
as 2:2007cv01394
Plaintiff:
RANJANBEN PARSHOTTAMBHAI UKANI
Defendant:
PETER D. KEISLER, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
