Cases 11 - 19 of 19
MINNICH v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2014cv07236
Plaintiff:
PAMELA MINNICH
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. , CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHNEE v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2014cv03195
Plaintiff:
DIANE M. SCHNEE
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY , JOHN DOE(S), PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAIER v. THE HONORABLE MAGGIE SNOW et al
as 5:2013cv06669
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAIER
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE MAGGIE SNOW, JOHN A. LEHMAN, LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KRUGER v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2012cv06248
Plaintiff:
DEBRA A. KRUGER
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY , PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., MEDICAL ASSOCIATES-UPMC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shreve v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2012cv00935
Plaintiff:
Brett John Shreve
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison and Prime Care Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. KINCH et al
as 2:2012cv01509
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STEWART
Defendant:
ROBERT KINCH , ARMBRUSTER , EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARFIELD v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03671
Plaintiff:
DARRYL BARFIELD
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WILLIAM YOUNG, BRIAN GROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON et al v. MEDLOCK et al
as 2:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE JOHNSON and LORRAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
LARRY MEDLOCK, GEARY O'NEIL, ANTHONY DELVERME and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCullough v. Prime Care Medical, Incorporated et al
as 3:2007cv01187
Plaintiff:
Michael P. McCullough
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Incorporated, Jane Doe and Mary Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
