Cases 11 - 20 of 37
GUZMAN v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2020cv06276
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, AS-YET-IDENTIFIED POLICE OFFICERS 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv03113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZISA v. HAVILAND et al
as 2:2017cv05551
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KEN ZISA
Defendant:
JOHN HAVILAND , TIMOTHY CONDON , ZAIDA MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon Roman Soto v. Mathew Perk, et al
as 17-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMON E. ROMAN SOTO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATHEW PERK, CARLOS RODRIGUEZ and NINA W. PADILLA, individually and in their official capacity
Randy Padilla v. Township of Hamilton, et al
as 17-2163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RANDY PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON and HAMILTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant - Appellant:
OFFICER JAMES SCOTT, Badge #347, Individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the Hamilton Police Department
ROMAN SOTO v. PERK et al
as 2:2017cv02193
Plaintiff:
RAMON E. ROMAN SOTO
Defendant:
MATHEW PERK, CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, (1 TO 100 JOHN DOES) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DILLON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv01993
Plaintiff:
ALAN S. DILLON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY , BOB MARTIN , DAN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
